Grundfos SP vs A.Y. McDonald
We sell both lines. Here is the honest head-to-head at matched flow families, all-stainless build against all-stainless build, so you can choose on the merits.
10 GPM — Grundfos 10S vs A.Y. McDonald 24000 K
| Spec |
Grundfos 10S SP |
A.Y. McDonald 24000 K |
| Rated flow |
10 GPM |
10 GPM |
| Motor range |
1/2–5 HP |
1/2–5 HP |
| Pump-end material |
100% AISI 304 stainless throughout |
Stainless pump end, shaft and coupling |
| Discharge |
1-1/4 in NPT |
1-1/4 in NPT |
| Wiring options |
2-wire, 3-wire 1Ph, 3Ph |
2-wire, 3-wire 1Ph, 3-wire 3Ph |
| Complete package |
Pump end + motor (+ control box on 3-wire 1Ph) |
Pump end + motor + leads; control box on 3-wire 1Ph, starter kit on 3Ph |
| Potable-water listing |
NSF/ANSI 61 and 372 (MH26400) |
Confirm listing on the model |
Verdict. Even at 10 GPM the two are close on paper. The Grundfos 10S carries the documented NSF 61 and 372 listing and the fully stainless build with sand-channel bearings and priming screw; the A.Y. McDonald 24000 ships with the motor starter kit included on three-phase and is typically the lower-cost complete package. If first cost drives the job, the A.Y. McDonald wins; if the specification calls out NSF listing and long service life in sandy or aggressive water, the Grundfos does.
15 GPM — Grundfos 16S vs A.Y. McDonald 24000 L
| Spec |
Grundfos 16S SP |
A.Y. McDonald 24000 L |
| Rated flow |
16 GPM |
15 GPM |
| Motor range |
1/2–10 HP |
1/2–5 HP |
| Nominal head span |
112–1636 ft |
To roughly 5 HP head |
| Pump-end material |
100% AISI 304 stainless |
Stainless pump end |
| Discharge |
1-1/4 in NPT |
1-1/4 in NPT |
Verdict. The Grundfos 16S rates a nominal 16 GPM against the A.Y. McDonald 15 GPM and reaches 10 HP and far deeper settings, so on a deep or high-head 15 GPM well the 16S has real headroom the 24000 L does not. For a shallow-to-moderate 15 GPM domestic well the A.Y. McDonald covers the duty at lower cost.
25 GPM — Grundfos 25S vs A.Y. McDonald 24000 M
| Spec |
Grundfos 25S SP |
A.Y. McDonald 24000 M |
| Rated flow |
25 GPM |
25 GPM |
| Motor range |
1/2–10 HP |
1–5 HP |
| Nominal head span |
64–1082 ft |
To roughly 5 HP head |
| Discharge |
1-1/2 in NPT |
1-1/4 in NPT |
| Constant-pressure option |
CUE / CUE 100 drive, factory package |
Third-party drive |
Verdict. At 25 GPM the Grundfos 25S pulls ahead on head and horsepower and offers a factory constant-pressure package (CUE 100) the A.Y. McDonald line does not match. The A.Y. McDonald 24000 M remains the value pick for a straightforward fixed-speed 25 GPM well within its head range.
35 GPM — Grundfos 35S vs A.Y. McDonald 24000 R
| Spec |
Grundfos 35S SP |
A.Y. McDonald 24000 R |
| Rated flow |
35 GPM |
35 GPM |
| Motor range |
3/4–20 HP |
1–10 HP |
| Nominal head span |
61–1482 ft |
To roughly 10 HP head |
| Configurations |
60 |
18 |
Verdict. On high-flow, high-head duty the Grundfos 35S reaches 20 HP and holds a far wider range of duty points; the A.Y. McDonald 24000 R covers the mainstream 35 GPM band at lower cost. A.Y. McDonald also offers the AutoPAC pre-assembled system (pump, motor, tank and control), which has no direct Grundfos equivalent in this range.
Where A.Y. McDonald wins. Lower first cost on most matched duties; a no-lead brass option (21000 series) and thermoplastic option (22000/25000) for buyers who do not need full stainless; the AutoPAC complete-system package; and three-phase units that ship with the starter kit included. We stock and support both — tell us the well and the budget and we will quote the honest fit.